Hello everyone and welcome back to Jaggy's Corner where I discuss
various video gaming topics during the week. This time around I'm
talking about a player who is now banned from all FIFA events.
I'm, of course, talking about Kurt "Kurt0411" Fenech who
was found in violation of EA's code of conduct. The professional
esports player, Kurt, repeatedly stated his criticisms about FIFA 20
on his YouTube channel and his Twitch streams. He would engage in
rants about the game on Twitter as well. Unfortunately, Kurt ended up
on the receiving end of old big and nasty EA play. In fact, EA was so
offended by his actions that they even went as far to shut down
Kurt's FIFA Ultimate Team account - which he had had for over 10
years - they unloaded numerous copyright strikes to his YouTube
channel and attempted to shut down his Twitch channel. After
following through on their actions to take Kurt down, EA proceeded to
post a press release about their decision to ban the player from all
tournaments. (What? Isn't that a little extreme?)
Keep in mind that all of this is happening to a player who is the
second most popular player/streamer/content creator of FIFA 20, and
not to some random player who thinks they're good at the game. One
would think that as a major contributor to the community around the
game, that EA might have considered other means of dealing with the
situation. But, sadly, this is not the case. EA claimed that Kurt was
threatening staff, and without citing any sources, took down as much
of the player's content as possible. I think that might have been
overstepping their bounds...
But, this isn't where the buck stops when it comes to EA. Earlier on
in the year, Donovan "Tekkz" Hunt, another professional
player of FIFA 20, mentioned at the FUT Champions Cup in Paris that
the game was "unrewarding" and that "games were
50/50." (This information can be found
here.) And yet, even though Tekkz has also been
critical of the game, he has not received any of the same treatment.
Yet this particular player made it into the semi-finals and is part
of team Fnatic. I have to question why would one pro player receive
extremely harsh punishment and not another? Is it because Tekkz is
perhaps less aggressive with his criticisms? Though, if Tekkz keeps
up with the criticism, EA might still go after him. Right now though,
that is mere speculation.
https://twitter.com/EA/status/1232060677507801091
Now, there are a couple of things that I've also read about the
situation. The first is that some EA employees Twitter
accounts were hacked following Kurt's ban. Tweets were
sent out in support of the player through Twitter, leading EA
employees to believe that Kurt, or people in his community, are
responsible. (Though I should add that even if he or his community
was responsible, that having some basic protections against hacking
benefits everyone who uses social media. Basically, everyone. There
may not be a full-proof way to do this, but reducing the risk is
never a bad thing. And, in this case, if EA's employees accounts were
hacked into, I have to question EA employees ability to have
security...) The other bit of information I stumbled upon is that
earlier today, both Apex Legends and FIFA 20 servers went down due to
outages. In fact, this is the second time in less than a month this
has happened. To me, while that may not be related, it seems like
convenient timing.
So this is what I'm thinking about. I feel like EA's press release
was a bad idea for them because they destroyed the reputation of one
of their top players without (as far as I can tell) reaching out to
him in an attempt to find a resolution. By publishing the press
release, not only did EA make Kurt a scapegoat, but they also
potentially ruined his life. As such, it feels a lot like a hit
piece, which is a published article that aims to smear the name of an
individual or company. While to the public the press release seemed
like a harsh warning to the community, I see EA's actions as
something more - otherwise, why post about it?
But what really perplexes me about the situation is why EA didn't
cite proof of Kurt's alleged threats? They nuked any evidence showing
the statements / criticisms made by Kurt. If they wanted people on
their side, wouldn't they have something to show for it?
Other questions come to mind like why did EA only go after this one
player? What does this prove? And don't you guys think that was too
much, regardless of how much Kurt may have complained about things
that needed to be fixed? We aren't talking about a one-time player
here, this is someone who has spent hundreds, if not thousands of
hours in that game. He might have SOME useful insight even if he
stated his opinions in aggressive ways. And furthermore, if multiple
players are experiencing the same issues, wouldn't it have been
better to actually listen so that maybe the game could be MORE
successful?
I mean, Sports games aren't really my thing, and at the end of the
day, this topic isn't something I'm truly passionate about. However,
if game companies don't listen to their players, how do they really
stand to survive? In this case, I believe that EA is setting an
example of what not to do as a billion-dollar company. But that is
just my thoughts on the matter.
Until next time peeps!